
During the last years of my father’s life, I would travel to Madrid to visit him. Each night after dinner, we had a ritual: we’d watch a movie together. He had this little notepad, where he would carefully jot down the date, the name of the film, the director, and the main actors. There was something deeply ceremonial about it—his love for cinema, his sharp intellect, and his reverence for the art form turned every evening into something so special with such connection.
By the end of his life, those notebooks held over 350 titles. He was, without a doubt, the most brilliant and intellectual man I’ve ever known, with a photographic memory and a unique appreciation for art in all its forms. By his own account a frustrated painter himself.
The night we watched Pollock is etched in my heart. My brother Tony—a well-known artist himself—joined us, and the three of us were completely absorbed. What followed was a sort of movie forum of our own. My father, with his deep historical and cultural knowledge, spoke about the evolution of art and society; Tony shared insights about that particular period in the art world and how Pollock was a true revolutionary; and I, moved by the emotional gravity of Pollock’s story, spoke about the fragility I saw in him.
Pollock's torment, his raw genius, and the turbulent currents he navigated hit me the most. He seemed like a deeply fragile spirit, trying to survive in an unforgiving world and a chaotic inner landscape. Watching his pain, his bursts of creative brilliance, and the way he wrestled with his demons left an impression on me that I still carry.
Pollock offered more than just a biopic—it gave a window into the soul of a man pulled between destruction and creation. It gave context to his art, offered glimpses into his deeply painful process, and showed just how volatile and vulnerable an artist’s spirit can be. But most of all, this movie has a sacred place in my heart because it brings back the memory of that night with my father and brother—talking about art, about life, and about the ache of being human. These are memoirs I will hold close to my heart for the rest of my life.
About the Film
Pollock (2000), directed by and starring Ed Harris, is a biographical drama based on the life of Jackson Pollock, one of the most influential figures in the abstract expressionist movement. The film delves into his creative genius, his groundbreaking contributions to modern art, and his deeply troubled personal life, including his battle with alcoholism and his relationship with fellow artist Lee Krasner.
The performances are outstanding—Ed Harris’s portrayal is powerful, emotionally raw, and widely regarded as Oscar-worthy. Marcia Gay Harden, who plays Lee Krasner, won an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress.
If you’re drawn to biopics, especially those centered on artists, Pollock is a must-watch. It offers a rich, emotional, and sometimes painful look at the interplay between artistic brilliance and personal fragility.
Themes in Pollock
The Complexity of Creativity – What does it mean to be a genius, and what does it cost?
Fragility and Power – How inner turmoil and vulnerability fuel artistic expression.
Sacrifice and Partnership – Lee Krasner’s unwavering support and the sacrifices she made.The Art World’s Pressure – Fame, critics, and the influence of the New York art scene.
Addiction and Self-Destruction – How Pollock’s alcoholism shaped—and destroyed—his path.
Questions for Reflection & Movie Club Discussion
How did the film portray the creative process of Jackson Pollock?
Did Lee Krasner's sacrifices for Jackson’s career resonate with you? Why or why not?
How did the film depict the influence of the New York art scene on Pollock’s development?
Did you find the portrayal of Pollock’s alcoholism authentic, or did it feel sensationalized?
How does the film intertwine Pollock’s personal struggles with his art?
In what ways did the visual choices in the film reflect Pollock’s artistic style?
How do you interpret the tension between genius and madness in Pollock’s life?
What role does recognition and fame play in Pollock’s unraveling?
What did you feel about Ed Harris’s performance—was it convincing and moving for you?
How does Pollock compare to other films about artists in terms of emotional depth and storytelling?
Have you watched Pollock? What parts moved you, and what did it leave you thinking about art, struggle, or the fine line between creation and destruction? I’d love to hear how it resonated with you. Let’s reflect together.
Want to see it? Find out where it is here.